[All images courtesy of christian-bale.org - there are 11 individual images and, as always, you need to click on each one to make it big enough to read.]






















I guess this news is actually a day old but I just heard about it, so it's news to me! :o) Rumor has it that James McAvoy is the #1 guy in the running to play the titular character in The Hobbit. According to ShowbizSpy.com:Scottish actor JAMES McAVOY has been tipped to take the lead role in the new movie version of LORD OF THE RINGS prequel THE HOBBIT.
J.R.R. Tolkien's novel is set to be turned into a major blockbuster under the direction of Guillermo del Toro and filming is due to begin in New Zealand later this year (08).
Sir Ian McKellen will reprise his role as Gandalf and McAvoy is rumoured to be the favourite to take the lead role of hobbit Bilbo Baggins.
The character was played by Ian Holm in the previous films of the fantasy franchise, but he is due to be replaced by a high profile star for the new movie.
A source tells British newspaper the Daily Express, "A number of names have been doing the rounds, including Daniel Radcliffe and Jack Black, but James (McAvoy) is the one the film's bosses really want.
"They're expected to have talks soon so hopefully it could be confirmed in the not too distant future."
And director del Toro adds, "I can tell you it's down to a few names that we all agree upon. For our first choice, completely magically we all have the same name."
James is a bit wee - he's 5'7" - so I suppose he'd make a good hobbit. Elijah is 5'6" as is Sean Astin (is that the "official" height under which an actor will not stipulate to being or what?) so James would fit right in. Man! Robert totally missed his window of potential Hollywood popularity - he's 5'6", too! (But he actually is.) I very much like James McAvoy so if he really is going to play Bilbo Baggins, I'll be excited. Granted, hobbits are never hot (who is with a Greg Brady perm, really?) but it'll be a more high profile role for James and it's always a bonus for actors you like to actually get work...
Nothing huge to report but, again, I'm scraping the bottom of the barrel here, people! Apparently, news has just broken that Christian Bale has signed on for not one but three new Terminator 'sequels.' Oh. Joy.Christian Bale is to play rebel leader John Connor in three sequels to the Terminator franchise, its producers have revealed.
The Welsh-born star, who is soon to be seen in Batman Begins sequel The Dark Knight, has already started shooting the first of those films, Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins.
"He's really an actor's actor, so we're very proud," said Victor Kubicek of film company Halcyon.
Charlie's Angels director McG is directing the new film, which is due to be released on 22 May 2009.
"Christian was our first choice and he's a big fan of The Terminator, so we're very lucky," Kubicek told the BBC at the Cannes Film Festival.
"But with Batman he's already done the whole franchise thing, so we weren't sure he'd respond."
Luckily, said Kubicek's business partner Derek Anderson, "he read the script and he loved it, so he's signed on for all three."
Now, I love me some Christian Bale, as you know, and I will thus be forced to see these stupid new iterations of Terminator but - ugh - do we really need three more?! Seriously? My only hope is that McG isn't directing them all... we all know how beloved the Angels franchise is.
In the highly anticipated new installment of The Terminator film franchise, set in post-apocalyptic 2018, Christian Bale stars as John Connor, the man fated to lead the human resistance against Skynet and its army of Terminators. But the future Connor was raised to believe in is altered in part by the appearance of Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington), a stranger whose last memory is of being on death row. Connor must decide whether Marcus has been sent from the future, or rescued from the past. As Skynet prepares its final onslaught, Connor and Marcus both embark on an odyssey that takes them into the heart of Skynet’s operations, where they uncover the terrible secret behind the possible annihilation of mankind.
(from themovingpicture.net)
EWWW!!!!! WHO on Earth would get this tattoo?!!! And who would date armpit-crotch-guy?!!! I didn't even like typing the phrase...
As much as I liked and watched the series, I'm not sure if I'll see the movie in the theater. It just seems... long. Two hours and 22 minutes of nonstop SATC just seems like 55 minutes too many! Plus, I didn't mind how the series ended and if the movie mucks it up, I'll be bummed. Still, I could not stop myself from searching for spoilers so if you're interested in the big plot points, I have listed them in the comments. (When I find a more complete spoiler I'll post that, too).
Oh, my poor brain is just chockablock FULL of useless information! It both distresses and awes me, I must say. :o) Robert and I watched Rescue Dawn this weekend (pretty okay... not great but interesting, though not at all like I thought it would be) and as I watched, I felt like I recognized one of the extras. I didn't say anything to Robert because I have an awesome streak going - I have only one miss* in all my voiced "Hey! It's That Guy!" moments - and I wasn't confident enough to make it count. (Hey, if I don't actually articulate my thought it doesn't officially count!) I am almost always the one that family and friends turn to when they want to know who someone is or in what else they've seen a certain actor. Even when Robert knows better, he sometimes doubts me - only to wind up bowing down before me as I knew he would!!! TV Guide has a new frenemy: Michael Ausiello is joining Entertainment Weekly, after eight fantastic years as our resident scooper.
"Michael has been a great reporter and a great friend," says TVGuide.com editor-in-chief Christy Tanner. "We wish him the best, and promise that we won’t miss a beat delivering all the great scoop you’re used to on TVGuide.com."
Question: After watching the finale of NCIS, I wonder if the writers did not see House this season.While I agree that reassigning an entire team can shake up a show and give it new life if done well, NCIS was not in a place where it needed to be shaken up and House failed to adequately integrate the old and new teams. NCIS is not in a position where integration of the old and new teams is possible. Unless they do an episode in Israel, with the Ronald Reagan offshore and a cybercrime…but how contrived does that sound? At least we still have Gibbs, Ducky, Abby and Palmer. — Veronica N.
Matt Roush: I don't know for sure where NCIS is heading next season, but until I hear otherwise, I'm assuming that the final reveal of a new NCIS team (with many of the current regulars reassigned) is just a temporary twist. Rocky Carroll as the new director is such an obvious bad guy that I can't imagine him sticking around for long — and who would want him to? (Again, just guessing here.) Splitting up the team sounds more like a traditional cliffhanger to me than a long-term rebuilding strategy such as House embarked on. But you're absolutely right. Seeing how badly it played on House, why would an even more mainstream show want to go there?Another look at NCIS, from Alex M.: "I'm curious of your thoughts on NCIS. It's always been one of my favorites, and since its return from the strike-induced hiatus, I feel the tone has been much darker (including Ziva's near-death experience and its haunting of her, Jimmy's near-death experience, and the gloomy season finale). I'm not sure if this is tied to the change in show-runner away from Donald Bellisario, but I just feel that the show has begun to take itself too seriously. The good thing about this show has always been its cast chemistry, quirky subplots and comedic relief. Don't get me started on the possibility of replacing two-thirds of the cast, but I just think the tinkering that's been done has ruined the feel of the show that I used to love."
NCIS isn't one of my regular stops, but I do tune in occasionally — most recently, the way-overlong two-hour finale and the Ziva episode — and my much more casual observation is that any change of tone might be an effect of the strike and the compressed season, which could explain why there weren't as many light capers to vary the mood as the show barreled toward the end of the season with these big, more serious and pivotal episodes. I agree with you about the quirky humor of the character interplay. It is the show's most appealing quality, and if they lose sight of it with this latest shake-up (however long it lasts), that won't be a good thing.
• Are they really writing out McGee, DiNozzo and Ziva à la House, or will they all be back next season?! Patrick
Brennan: No fan of NCIS will be disappointed when the show returns in September. I promise, we're not doing a House! But strap into your seats, it's going to be a heart stopping ride....
• Please, please, please tell me that they’re not really breaking up the team on NCIS! Lu Ann
Brennan: Deep breaths. Everything is going to be fine. This is Gibbs' team, right?
• Will the show be introducing any new team members next season? Chris
Brennan: Yes. And no.
The Sunday block, launching Sept. 14 at 6:30 pm/ET (versus the traditional 7), still won't resurrect CBS' Moonlight, but instead features:
• In Harm's Way, an unscripted series following people in dangerous or unenviable jobs (avalanche hunters, subway tunnel diggers, Denise Richards' publicist).
• Surviving Suburbia, a comedy based on a long-ago dismissed pilot about a grumpy husband and father.
• Valentine, Inc., a romantic comedy in which the Greek gods Aphrodite and her son Eros run an Earth-bound dating service.
• Easy Money, about a family of loan sharks — including a middle son who's uneasy about their line of work.
Addressing the decision to pass up the opportunity to pick up the cult hit and its eight million viewers, MRC TV president Keith Samples explains to Variety, "It just didn't seem in the end that it was the right thing to do at this moment in time.
"We're going down a new path here, I'll be the first to admit," Samples adds. "Things will come up on this road we didn't foresee, and we will evolve."
2) Bacteriffic brushesThey make these things that are like mascara wands that you dip, brush onto a model's lashes, and then throw away. Steal them from Sephora if you must.
Once a makeup artist used a single-use brush for my first mascara application of the day, and then, a few hours later, dashed in for a touch-up with her Great Lash Waterproof's own sticky, abused wand. "Oh," she said, noting my horrified visage. "This mascara will just go on over the mascara you're already wearing. So I'm not actually putting it on your eyes."
Until you're the one at risk of pink eye, I reserve the right to give you a don't-piss-on-my-leg look. And to ask you to use my mascara, which I take with me to every job just in case.
3) Pointy pencils
Related to above: Makeup artists who try to use dirty, unsharpened eye and lip pencils, I hate you. And when I ask you, nicely, to please expose some fresh lead before you wave that shit all over my mucous membranes, it would be a relief if you were to resist the urge to pull back aghast, sneer playing about your lips, and furiously carve an eye pencil into a rapier point before raking it all over the inside of my upper and lower lids. Do you want me to cry? Because I will, and then you will have to do it all completely over again, and if that is what you want…well Sartre had a point I guess!
6) The fake eyelash and you
True story: Once a makeup artist put fake lashes on my left eye upside down. Instead of curling upwards and outwards and bringing out my inner Judy Garland, the lashes turned inwards and attacked my cornea like so many spider legs. In removing the fake lash strip, he was so careless with the solvent that ripped out four of my own. Then he had the toe-curling awfulness to chide me for crying. If you think you're ready for Advanced Makeup Artistry: Falsies, you better know what the f-ck you're doing.
I tried doing the throat thing @ 1:20 - no way. This guy is mind-blowing! I can't believe how flexible he is and how much muscle control he has. It's astounding!! I don't know how or why people learn to do stuff like this but I am so glad they do... this is why I love this show!
Oh. My. God. Someone from Fremont finally makes it on to So You Think You Can Dance and it's this guy?! Bummer. First Michael Magidson and now Rijiy... Fremont is awesome!



Sources confirm that [Fox] has inked a deal to return for the show's ninth-season premiere next fall.
Specifics of her comeback are being kept under lock and key, but my CSI mole assures me that she "won't be appearing in a flashback." The likely scenario has Sara returning to Vegas toshag Grissommourn ex-colleague Warrick, who was shot (and presumably) killed in last week's finale. I say "presumably" because in the current issue of TV Guide, Mendelsohn says Gary Dourdan will be back in the fall — and "not just in flashbacks."
I've got three words for you: Gut-wrenching death scene.
There are conflicting reports as to why exactly this event was occurring but most tend to indicate that this was a part of Discovery's upfront presentation. Mike Rowe, of course, hosts Dirty Jobs and narrates Deadliest Catch - he's also a trained opera singer and has sung several times on Jobs. (Discovery got lucky there because it doesn't look like any of the other guys are really relishing their moment behind the mic). The first guy up is, obviously, Man vs. Wild's Bear Grylls (nervous much?); then you have the Catch captains (Sig, Andy, Jonathan, Keith and Phil - Andy and Jonathan captain the same boat... cheaters!); third is Josh Bernstein (someone of whom I had no idea but that Robert apparently hates - I guess he hosted Digging for the Truth on the History channel and will host Into the Unknown with Josh Bernstein for Discovery pretty soon); and lastly you see Ben Bailey (who I also didn't know but who hosts Cash Cab).
I really enjoyed the guys I recognized, naturally, though I had the hardest time making out parts of the captains' lyrics. So, in case you're retarded and anal like me and can't rest until you know what they're saying, here are the words:
We love the ocean
We love the pitch and yaw,
We love the big waves,
We love a king crab claw,
We love the whole world,
It's one big rainstorm
This is indeed a spoiler, though not in the traditional sense. Yes, it gives away major plot points so if you want to see Kingdom of the Crystal Skull with a clean slate this Thursday, you'll want to skip the link. However, the article doesn't really spell everything out in a super-clear fashion; it's more of a review/recap presented as a conversation between two Defamer writers.| I will summarize this movie for you and save you the rental money |
| by Leonidas808 (Sun May 4 2008 03:51:02) | |
| UPDATED Sun May 4 2008 03:51:24 | |
One good thing about this photo - no podiums by which to measure our shortness in relation to other prom goers! Christina was always quick to point out how much taller she and her date were...

You know I love me a good spoiler, so when I came across this article, I couldn't pass it up. It's an article on M. Night Shyamalan's newest film The Happening - a "paranoid thriller" coming out Friday the 13th (of June). That makes it that much scarier, no?! Anyhoo, a brief synopsis: "Suddenly and for seemingly no reason a neuro-toxin is released in the "The Happening" is a terrible, terrible movie. I mean, it's bad on an epic scale. It's so bad that I can't possibly tell you how bad it is without understating the point or making it sound like I'm picking on the film. But let me stress: this is not pent-up Shyamalan aggression or a desire to see him fail. This is bad in a jaw-dropping "they can't really be serious, can they?" kind of way. The closest comparison I can draw is to Neil LaBute's "Wicker Man" and, like that film, the only consolation I can offer potential theater-goers is that you might want to see it just to be in on the ground floor when the film gets its ass handed back to it.
TVGuide.com: Why did you decide to leave Numbers? Creative differences? The aforementioned twins?
Farr:It was actually none of the above. I'm not leaving because I'm having babies. I'm leaving because I'm going to do a different job. I think after three years, most actors feel the need to see what else they can use their brain for. Numbers was such a perfect job. It was easy and it was fun and it was good people. I pitched an idea to a boss that I had before. He liked [it], and I decided to go with it.
TVGuide.com: You mean Peter Tolan, from The Job and Rescue Me. So what's the project?
Farr: It's an hour drama. There's no gun, no fire hoses. I want to wear a pretty dress for the next few years! But I've done five series where I'm the only girl, and it works perfectly for me. We'll probably keep that going.
Get ready for "the most shocking episode of CSI ever," according to exec producer Carol Mendelsohn. Given that past finales have featured Nick (George Eads) buried alive and a shocking revelation that Grissom (William Petersen) and Sara (Jorja Fox) had been sleeping together, they've got a lot to live up to.
But Mendelsohn promises they'll deliver. "It's a very personal episode," she says. Warrick finds himself in more trouble following past episodes in which he was suspected of murder and suspended while investigating a Vegas mobster. The result is that sides will be drawn, and as TV Guide has reported, Dourdan — who was recently arrested — is leaving CSI.
The question remains how. Mendelsohn says, "No one will ever forget it, and it will change the show forever."
This season, which was interrupted by a months-long writers' strike, more of Mr. Lorre's messages focused on behind-the-scenes negotiations between television's creative and corporate forces. In a recent script for "The Big Bang Theory," Mr. Lorre included a reference to a fictional Catholic priest molesting a boy. CBS insisted the reference be removed, out of concern that it might offend certain viewers. (The line was changed, to refer to a "chaplain.") In a vanity card that he wanted to run at the end of the episode, Mr. Lorre shared the censored reference, explaining how and why he fought to keep it in the script.
After submitting that card to the network, Mr. Lorre says he received a call from Nancy Tellem, president of the CBS Paramount Network Television Entertainment group. "What are you thinking?" she said. A spokesman for Ms. Tellem confirms this account.
"You know you're in trouble when someone that high up the ladder bothers to call," says Mr. Lorre.
That card never aired. Instead, he wrote a new one for the show that read: "Just two episodes back from the strike and I've already managed to write a vanity card that is completely unacceptable to the good folks at CBS." He posted the outlawed version on his own Web site.
"We sort of imagine Chuck sitting around saying, 'What can I try to get away with this week?'" says Chris Ender, a CBS spokesman.
Now, I think it's great that someone finally noticed ol' Chuck's episodic blurbs (I actually saw Chuck in the flesh when Robert and I went to a taping of Men - I know, I'm special... and you know me!) but... Hello, ten years ago!! The man's been doing this for ages! Sure, their a bit more snarky and feature more corporate commentary these days but c'mon, people! Old news!! And, not necessarily news Chuck is uber-thrilled about, as this card points out: