
[I just hope this doesn't cause a copyright issue that ultimately shuts down my channel... it would not be the first time and it is a bitch and a half reestablishing and reuploading all my crap! Fingers crossed...]

constantly streaming in and out and chatting with me but what can I do? Anyway, today I'd really like to punch someone in the head.* This one guy has been in my office TWENTY TWO times in the last hour. (Yes, I've counted.) And every single time he does he doesn't find whatever papers he's looking for so he pokes every button on the printer multiple times, checks the paper tray multiple time and checks the ink cartridges multiple times. He does this every single time without exception. Now, I know the printer works. Everyone else, myself included, has been printing stuff all day - even in and around Dumbass McButtonPusher's "print jobs" - with no problem. I desperately want to shout at the guy "IT'S NOT THE PRINTER! IT'S YOU!!!!!!!!!!" but as yet I have not. Deep breath. If I injure someone at work, I will only have to stay here longer... ;o)
I thought this article on Yahoo! sports was quite interesting. It's by Janet Evans and it tackles a few topic pertinent to the Olympic swimmers this year: the new swimsuit, the effect of the schedule flip (NBC is ga-ga for Michael Phelps and so paid beaucoup bucks to get the IOC to move the swimming finals to the AM in China so they can be broadcast live here in the U.S.) and the effect of the too-close-to-the-Games U.S. Olympic trials on the athletes. I'm not a huge Olympic follower - yeah, I'll watch what interests me and sort of keep tabs on things on the Web but it's safe to say I don't keep my finger constantly on the pulse of the Games! - but I do like to watch swimming and found the article to be very enlightening. I always feel bad for the dancers that got cut early on (*cough* Jamie *cough*) because no one really remembers them and they hang around for 2 or more hours and only get to dance a total of 30 seconds. And we, the viewers, probably only see their faces for, oh, 5 seconds of that 30 seconds. :o( Poor little losers.
Oh, and if you have seen the finale already, here's a link to EW.com's recap of the show... and here's a link to their recap of Wednesday night's show. I found the latter much more interesting, if only because the recapper really goes to town highlighting what could be the producers' (not so) subtle means of voter tampering. Well, voter bias-ing, I guess I should say. If that was a real word.
Law & Order: SVU (Season premiere: September 23rd)
CSI (Season Premiere: October 9th)
Pushing Daisies (Season Premiere: October 1st)Beloved Everwood curmudgeon Debra Mooney has been cast as Chi McBride's chain-smoking, no-nonsense mother... sources confirm to me exclusively. As of now, Mooney's on board for one episode, but I'm told the role has significant recurring potential. Mooney's character, Calista Cod, is one of the best private investigators in the biz. She arrives for a visit with her boy (and ex-partner) Emerson, and winds up helping him with a murder case. As the two begin to reconnect, Mama discovers that her chip off the old block has been keeping some vital information from her. And before you ask, no, Calista's not blind. [Ask Ausiello]
Stephen Root has booked a four-episode arc on Daisies. His character "has a shared history with both Ned's dad and Chuck's dad," explains series creator Bryan Fuller. "He stirs up a lot of hullabaloo for everyone, particularly Aunts Lily and Vivian." [Ask Ausiello]
IESB has a few choice quotes from Robert Downey Jr. about what to expect from Iron Man 2, which we’ve got for you here: “Our goals are more of the same. The idea that he said he’s Iron Man in part 1…it’s one thing to say it, and it’s another thing to actually evolve to the point where you can live in a heroic fashion. You know, they say, ‘The superhero movie always needs to follow…’ and I said who is that guy? Get him out of here! We want to do what worked for us last time, in a way that evolves.” Indeed, one of the best things about Iron Man was the way the production made a conscious decision to move away from the typical superhero cliches towards something a little more satisfying - what made sense for the character, not the genre. “We’re talking about a guy who is put in an extraordinary circumstance, and the people that are around him, and how that creates a sense of family, and how that disrupts whatever forces that we have to say that are working [in his life]. I like the idea of an Iron Man 2 that you’re able to understand various points of view. You’re able to touch on some subjects that are a lot more far reaching, while still grounding it in entertainment.” Is that a tease Iron Man 2 may touch on Stark’s alcoholism, a subplot director Jon Favreau has mentioned before? It might not be as commercially viable (then again, consider Hancock…), but it sure as hell would be interesting.
Movies Online posted an interview with McG re: Terminator Salvation which you can access here. It's a sorta-lengthy interview, so I won't repost the entire thing but I will say that, if you're interested in the movie, the interview is a good and worthwhile read. McG addresses several topics including how the movie fits in relative to the first three movies and the TV show:The continuity in the Terminator films was always a little flexible and no one really minds because they’re such wonderful stories. T2 is 10 years later and John looks like he’s 13. What's your take on the timeline when this starts?
MCG: Well there's no doubt that at the beginning of T3, for example, begins with a bit of a punt as to what happened at the end of T2, and there's some rejuggling of the timelines. We're largely treating it as though the bombs have gone off. I'm not going to share with you what the date is when the bombs go off, and we come into the picture in 2018. We’ve done the best we can to honor the timelines that have been put into place and I think it ultimately feels very satisfying. If we've done our job properly, then this will be regarded as the statement of the time and the place and the where and the when and the why and the how. And it comes from a place of doing a lot of research with, you know, futurists, with scientists who talk about how long it would take the atmosphere to clear itself out so you could actually go back outside and do your thing. We're trying to just sort of amalgamate the three pictures and amalgamate the intention, and then answer that to the best of our ability. Again, there are certain things that are in stone. The T800 comes in 2029, you know. We're building towards that place. Therefore, if hardware should show up in 2018 that was supposed to be around in 2029, that's a problem for John Connor.
The three go on to also clarify just exactly what Connor’s involvement is in the film, considering the rumor that he was just a supporting role. ANDERSON: John Connor is an ongoing, very central character throughout the next trilogy.
KUBICEK: Exactly. The mythology, really at the root of it, is the birth of the hero. John Connor is this modern-day, messianic figure that is going to lead our franchise forward.
ANDERSON: He’s leading the fight for the salvation of humanity against the machines. So he’s very important. “There’s gonna be another major co-star with kind of equal presence in this installment.” But who is this character? It’s not Arnold back as the Terminator, so who is it? “It is a new character introduced in the mythology that’s not replacing Arnold [Schwarzenegger]. It’s not like he’s stepping into Arnold’s shoes. It’s a completely new character.” Is it a Terminator at least? “No, not really. That’s one of the big twists…”
Obviously we won’t know the full answer to those questions until Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins arrives in theaters in 2009. But Kubicek teases, and confuses, with a bit more: “And it’s questionable if he’s an enemy or not. That’s not necessarily resolved.” However, to round things out and finalize the update, Derek Anderson delivers one final statement that definitely gets me excited. “It’s a really interesting time in the franchise because it’s where all the fans have always wanted the franchise to go, and it hasn’t to date, which is the post-apocalyptic world. It’s after judgment day. So because we’re in a different time in the mythology, it introduces a whole new set of circumstances and characters.”
CHUD (I know, it sounds gross but it stands for 'Cinematic Happenings Under Development') has
a couple snippets on Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. They don't feature any actual quotes from real people associated with the movie but they still seem pretty legitimate. The first one is from June and deals with whether or not the Fallen of the title actually refers to the character of the same name. I posted about this earlier but this author actually cared enough to gather up some info on the character and blah de blah blah so here you go:
Some TransFans began speculating that the Fallen of the title was actually a character from Transformers comics, an ancient Transformer who seems to play the Devil in their mythology. (A dude called Primus is like God. I think. Maybe the better correlation is that the Fallen is like Darkseid).
The Transformers wiki provides backstory: At the dawn of time, Primus created new life, the 13 original Transformers, to crew his planetary form into battle against his eternal nemesis Unicron. One of these 13, his original name now lost to the mists of time, turned against his siblings, his creator, and his universe, and betrayed them all. ...this guardian of entropy became obsessed with the darker side of chaos and death, and in the black place these urges led him, the betrayer found a new god, more suited to his nature. He turned against Primus and became the Fallen. Now he is a being of power, darkness, and absolute dedication to Unicron.
Here's what Wikipedia says about him: Around 6.5 million years ago, a test of the experimental "space bridge" matter-transport system on Cybertron liberated the Fallen from his prison, and he materialised on Cybertron, where he quickly recruited the Chaos Trinity, three mystically-inclined Decepticons - Bludgeon, Mindwipe and Bugly - into his employ. Abducting Transformers that he identified as possessing "genetic potential" within their sparks - Grimlock, Blitzwing, Jetfire and Hot Spot - the Fallen planned to use their energies to awaken Primus from his self-imposed slumber, thereby alerting Unicron to his location, allowing the world-eater to renew hostilities with his old enemy. An attack from combined Autobot and Decepticon forces led by Shockwave and Prowl disrupted his plans, and Primus himself reached out and promptly destroyed the Fallen.
Ooh. I'm all atwitter. Anyhoo, the second piece is more current (posted yesterday in fact) and deals with a spoiler of sorts. Now, I don't want to ruin anything for anyone but seriously - did anyone really think Megatron wasn't coming back for the second movie? Oops. Secret spoiled. Eh. You'll live. Sooo... here's the scoop:
If the current incarnation of the script follows the beats of a previous incarnation (which did not feature The Fallen), Megatron may be getting brought back by the Autobots, who need him to conquer the new menace. But I've learned that this time he won't be that weird alien jet. This time he's a tank.
Megatron apparently was a tank in the Transformers Generation 2 comic or toys or something (I don't know, I just looked it up on Wikipedia and I still don't get it), so this has some precedent. I imagine this is as close as we'll get to seeing him be a gun, since the movies appear to eschew the sort of size shifting antics that the comics and cartoons embraced.
Somewhere, Wade and Robert are excited. My work is done.

The first shoot I got whopped by some bees whilst raiding a nest to get honey. Hence the photo here. (although I did get the honey!)
But it meant that I had to spend the rest of the shoot looking like this, feeling terrible and only able to open my eyes with much effort.
Okay, so I've changed up today's posts a bit. I've moved the two TDK-related bits from 'Random Round-Up 14' to this post and added a few more Batman-centric articles to boot. I think that, since I seem to be so taken with these articles and I highly doubt that anyone else is - or has the ample free time I do - I will now post all articles concerning TDK here. Any anytime I add one or two, I'll update the post and bump it up to the top of the queue. Now you'll be able to skip such interesting-if-you-have-time-but-definitely-skippable- under-most-circumstances articles with just one click!! Won't that be nice? :o) (*NOTE: This does not apply to Christian-specific articles. Deal with it.)
But I find it distressing that guys - or, at the very least, Robert, Biji and Wade - would blow Maggie off so nonchalantly simply because she isn't a giant set of boobs on a stick. Bruce fell in love with Rachel as a child - he doesn't care what she looks like! I mean, when I fell in love with Robert he had a full head of luscious hair and abs. Should I kick him to the curb just because both of those attributes have long since said bye-bye?!!! I think not. Same logic applies to Bruce and Rachel. If, in fact, he finds her so "ugly" in the first place. Hmm... what was my original point here? Ah, yes, that Best Week Ever has published a big "Eff You" to all the Katie Holmes haters. I'm not exactly sure how that ties into my Gyllen-ugly rant but oh well.
7:15pm: People.com claimed that pictures of the almighty Jolie-Pitt twins would be revealed today at 7pm. (See? It says so right in the red banner.) Anna called me; I am sitting here waiting for these damn miracles (or "Infant Deities," as one commenter called them ). But right now it is 7:14pm and Knox and Vivi are no where to be seen. WTF....Van Doren goes into detail about how he was recruited to appear on Twenty-One, how the deception unraveled, how he lied to interrogators before ultimately coming clean, how temptation returned in the form of an offer to be a paid consultant on Redford's movie, how he felt about the finished film and Ralph Fiennes' performance as him, and how he learned over the years the differences between fame, celebrity, and notoriety. Two mysteries remain: why he agreed to the scam in the first place (he hints that money and fame were factors, but doesn't actually specify what made him so quick to compromise his integrity) and why he's suddenly willing to talk about it now. Still, Van Doren's account makes for a fascinating tale, especially given how much fakery there still is on television.
Here's the video that inspired the above Chris Martin fest, DM's 'Enjoy the Silence':
Chris and co. totally should've gone for the cropped leather jackets!! I consider their 'video cover' quite incomplete without them.
Yay! Keane's new album, Perfect Symmetry, is coming out October 13th. Wheeee!

As I said - it's an amusing way to kill time at work! :o) Anyway, I found the following comic at the site (the comic is actually originally from the New Yorker) and it struck a chord:
I always love the shorts that play before any Pixar movie in the theater - as I'm sure most people do. The most recent one, Presto (which debuted before Wall*E) is now viewable online at gamaniak. If you haven't yet seen it, you definitely should!!! Right now. Go.